<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We must end overfishing to help developing countries that depend on oceans to survive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://endoftheline.com/blog/archives/427/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://endoftheline.com/blog/archives/427</link>
	<description>Imagine a world without fish</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Back Away from the Tuna, Shrimp, and Salmon: 11 Sustainable, Healthy Seafood Choices &#124; EcoSalon</title>
		<link>http://endoftheline.com/blog/archives/427/comment-page-1#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>Back Away from the Tuna, Shrimp, and Salmon: 11 Sustainable, Healthy Seafood Choices &#124; EcoSalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endoftheline.com/blog/?p=427#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>[...] it’s so inefficient. It takes about 4 pounds of little wild fish to make 1 pound of salmon. When one-third of the world’s population depends on fish for its protein needs (including these little fish that we would call trash fish) it’s just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it’s so inefficient. It takes about 4 pounds of little wild fish to make 1 pound of salmon. When one-third of the world’s population depends on fish for its protein needs (including these little fish that we would call trash fish) it’s just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizzy</title>
		<link>http://endoftheline.com/blog/archives/427/comment-page-1#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endoftheline.com/blog/?p=427#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>I know that ideally, to make the problem better, the amount of out-of-bounds ocean should be greatly extended, then fishermen should be given some sort of allowance each... but realistically ...is that likely to happen? Is the answer to invest in a mass breeding (in captivity) of remaining stocks, so as to provide a more sustainable food resource?
I haven't yet seen the film- I have a feeling if I do, I will just be even more depressed about the state of the world. First the Age of Stupid and now this!? I'm sure it is a very well researched book, but isn't the film just more doom and gloom on a subject we, the public, can do very little about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that ideally, to make the problem better, the amount of out-of-bounds ocean should be greatly extended, then fishermen should be given some sort of allowance each&#8230; but realistically &#8230;is that likely to happen? Is the answer to invest in a mass breeding (in captivity) of remaining stocks, so as to provide a more sustainable food resource?<br />
I haven&#8217;t yet seen the film- I have a feeling if I do, I will just be even more depressed about the state of the world. First the Age of Stupid and now this!? I&#8217;m sure it is a very well researched book, but isn&#8217;t the film just more doom and gloom on a subject we, the public, can do very little about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
